Exploring Integrative Motivation in English Learning Among Indonesian EFL University Students: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study

Authors

  • Baharudin Adu Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Nining Syafitri Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Sanaria Maneba Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Wa Ode Hanafiah Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Asti Wahyuni B Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63435/jjee.v4i1.297

Keywords:

Integrative motivation; English learning; EFL

Abstract

Despite the growing body of research on language learning motivation, limited studies have examined how integrative motivation develops through students’ experiences in Indonesian EFL higher education using a mixed-methods design. This study aimed to investigate how EFL university students demonstrate integrative motivation in English learning and to identify the factors shaping their motivational orientations. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, involving 21 sixth-semester students of the English Education Study Program at Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University. Quantitative data were collected through a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to explain the quantitative findings. The quantitative results indicated that most participants demonstrated high (52.6%) and very high (38.2%) levels of integrative motivation toward English learning. The qualitative findings revealed three interconnected dimensions underlying students’ motivational development: intrinsic enjoyment as the foundation of integrative motivation, self-initiated learning engagement, and intercultural curiosity toward English-speaking communities. The integration of both data sources suggests that integrative motivation is not a fixed psychological attribute but a dynamic developmental process in which affective, behavioral, and intercultural dimensions continuously interact to sustain English learning. These findings provide empirical insights into the development of integrative motivation among Indonesian EFL university students and offer practical implications for designing English learning environments that promote meaningful engagement, student autonomy, and intercultural awareness.

 

References

Alanazi, S. S., & Hammaad, A. H. (2025). The role of motivation in learning English as a foreign language at Northern Border University. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8861

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.

Chang, J.-C., Wu, Y.-T., & Ye, J.-N. (2022). A study of graduate students’ achievement motivation, active learning, and active confidence based on relevant research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915770

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Curle, S., Yuksel, D., Aizawa, I., Thompson, G., & Rakhshandehroo, M. (2024). Academic success in English medium instruction programmes in Turkey: Exploring the effect of gender, motivation, and English language proficiency. International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102288

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model. Peter Lang.

Khorsheed, R. (2021). Youth culture and EFL students’ development of integrative motivation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1104.07

Kim, P. (2023). Energy conservation theory for second language acquisition (ECT-L2A): A partial validation of kinetic energy–aptitude and motivation. Frontiers in Physics, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1166949

Liu, X., & Dong, M. (2023). Exploring the relative contributions of learning motivations and test perceptions to autonomous English as a foreign language learning and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059375

Nguyen, T. T. (2025). Motivation for pursuing a bachelor of arts in English: A case study of students at Thu Dau Mot University. MULTIDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS Учредители: JABB-Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 8(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025072

Ni, F., & Xu, W. (2025). How do English proficiency and learning motivation shape EFL students’ emotions toward written corrective feedback? System, 131, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103681

Sun, Y., Teo, T., & Wang, T.-H. (2022). English-learning motivation among Chinese mature students: A comparative study of English and non-English majors. Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ bs12050135

Trautner, M., & Pinquart, M. (2025). Development of motivational self-regulation in childhood—An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1533625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533625

Wang, Z., Lu, J., & Yu, S. (2025). The impact of the flipped classroom on the motivation and academic performance of Chinese college English students. Plos One, 20(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322094

Zhu, Y., Dolmans, D., Köhler, S. E., Kusurkar, R. A., Abidi, L., & Savelberg, H. (2024). Paths to autonomous motivation and well-being: Understanding the contribution of basic psychological needs satisfaction in health professions students. Medical Science Educator, 34(6), 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02106-9

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Baharudin Adu, Syafitri, N., Sanaria Maneba, Wa Ode Hanafiah, & Asti Wahyuni B. (2026). Exploring Integrative Motivation in English Learning Among Indonesian EFL University Students: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study. Jolly Journal of English Education, 4(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.63435/jjee.v4i1.297